A comparison of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy in patients with compensated cirrhosis and symptomatic gallstone disease

Citation
Jl. Poggio et al., A comparison of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy in patients with compensated cirrhosis and symptomatic gallstone disease, SURGERY, 127(4), 2000, pp. 405-411
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
SURGERY
ISSN journal
00396060 → ACNP
Volume
127
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
405 - 411
Database
ISI
SICI code
0039-6060(200004)127:4<405:ACOLAO>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Background. The purpose of this study was to compare the risks and benefits of performing open cholecystectomy (OC) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( LC) in patients with compensated cirrhosis. Methods. Data on 50 patients who underwent cholecystectomy for the treatmen t of symptomatic gallstone disease between 1990 and 1997 were collected ret rospectively. These patients were divided into 2 groups: Group I included 2 4 patients who underwent OC, and Group II included 26 patients who underwen t LC. The cohorts were well-matched for age, sex, race, clinical presentati on and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) class. Twelve patients in Group I had a co ncomitant surgical procedure in contrast to only 2 patients in Group II. No patient in this study had CTP Class C cirrhosis. Results, There was no operative mortality. Conversion to OC was necessary i n 3 patients (12%) during LC because of uncontrollable liver bed bleeding i n 2 of the patients and insufficient visualization of the anatomy in 1 of t he patients. Mean surgical times were significantly longer in Group I when comparing patients from both groups without concomitant surgical procedures (mean +/- SD, 177 +/- 91.3 minutes vs 116.8 +/- 42.3 minutes, P = .037). N o patient in. Group II required any blood component replacement in contrast to 9 patients (38%) in Group I. Intraoperative bleeding remained significa ntly higher in Group I when comparing patients without concomitant surgical procedures (P = .043). No patients in Group II had a wound complication, c ompared with 2 patients (8%) in Group I. The 12 patients without concomitan t surgical procedures in Group I had significantly longer hospital stays wh en compared with 24 patients without concomitant surgical procedures in Gro up II (mean +/- SD, 6.9 days +/- 3.3 [median 6] vs 2.4 days +/- 1.8 [median 2.0]); P = .001. Conclusions. Our results demonstrate that laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be performed safely in patients with CTP Class A and B cirrhosis. It offers several advantages over open cholecystectomy, including lower morbidity, s horter operative time, and reduced hospital stay with less need for transfu sions.