H. Date et al., Predictors of improvement in FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1s) after lung volume reduction surgery, SURG TODAY, 30(4), 2000, pp. 328-332
We evaluated various preoperative and operative factors to identify the pre
dictors of improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) after lung
volume reduction surgery (LVRS). Fifty-eight emphysema patients received bi
lateral LVRS either via a sternotomy (n = 53) or by thoracoscopy (n = 5). T
he patients were divided into the following two groups: group I (n = 17), p
atients n hose FEV1 improved by less than 20%; group II (n = 41), patients
whose FEV1 improved by more than or equal to 20%. The preoperative factors
(age, degree of dyspnea, oxygen use, steroid use, pulmonary function test,
arterial blood gas, pulmonary hemodynamics, 6-min walking distance) and ope
rative factors (removed lung weight, number of staplers) mere both similar
bet treen the two groups. Upper lobe type emphysema was more frequently see
n in group II and the average improvement in FEV1 was significantly better
in the patients with upper lobe type emphysema (62.8% +/- 8.5%) than lower
lobe type (36.9% +/- 7.6%) and mixed type (35.5% +/- 6.5%), P < 0.01. Se, e
re pleural adhesion was more frequently found in group I and the average im
provement in FEV1 was also significantly lower in patients with severe pleu
ral adhesion (19.8% +/- 6.4%) than mild-to-moderate adhesion (46.8% a 5.3%)
and no-to-minimal adhesion (62.3% +/- 10.4%), P < 0.01. These results lead
us to conclude that upper lobe type emphysema may thus be a predictor of b
etter FEV1 improvement while severe pleural adhesion is considered to be a
predictor of a poorer FEV1 improvement after bilateral LVRS.