Predictors of improvement in FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1s) after lung volume reduction surgery

Citation
H. Date et al., Predictors of improvement in FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1s) after lung volume reduction surgery, SURG TODAY, 30(4), 2000, pp. 328-332
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
SURGERY TODAY-THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF SURGERY
ISSN journal
09411291 → ACNP
Volume
30
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
328 - 332
Database
ISI
SICI code
0941-1291(2000)30:4<328:POIIF(>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
We evaluated various preoperative and operative factors to identify the pre dictors of improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) after lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS). Fifty-eight emphysema patients received bi lateral LVRS either via a sternotomy (n = 53) or by thoracoscopy (n = 5). T he patients were divided into the following two groups: group I (n = 17), p atients n hose FEV1 improved by less than 20%; group II (n = 41), patients whose FEV1 improved by more than or equal to 20%. The preoperative factors (age, degree of dyspnea, oxygen use, steroid use, pulmonary function test, arterial blood gas, pulmonary hemodynamics, 6-min walking distance) and ope rative factors (removed lung weight, number of staplers) mere both similar bet treen the two groups. Upper lobe type emphysema was more frequently see n in group II and the average improvement in FEV1 was significantly better in the patients with upper lobe type emphysema (62.8% +/- 8.5%) than lower lobe type (36.9% +/- 7.6%) and mixed type (35.5% +/- 6.5%), P < 0.01. Se, e re pleural adhesion was more frequently found in group I and the average im provement in FEV1 was also significantly lower in patients with severe pleu ral adhesion (19.8% +/- 6.4%) than mild-to-moderate adhesion (46.8% a 5.3%) and no-to-minimal adhesion (62.3% +/- 10.4%), P < 0.01. These results lead us to conclude that upper lobe type emphysema may thus be a predictor of b etter FEV1 improvement while severe pleural adhesion is considered to be a predictor of a poorer FEV1 improvement after bilateral LVRS.