Randomized comparison of prophylactic antidiarrheal treatment versus no prophylactic antidiarrheal treatment in patients receiving CPT-11 (irinotecan) for advanced 5-FU-resistant colorectal cancer - An open-label multicenterphase II study
M. Ychou et al., Randomized comparison of prophylactic antidiarrheal treatment versus no prophylactic antidiarrheal treatment in patients receiving CPT-11 (irinotecan) for advanced 5-FU-resistant colorectal cancer - An open-label multicenterphase II study, AM J CL ONC, 23(2), 2000, pp. 143-148
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS
Delayed diarrhea is the main toxicity of irinotecan at the currently recomm
ended dose of 350 mg/m(2) 30-minute intravenous infusion, once every 3 week
s. This phase II, multicenter, open-label, randomized study was primarily d
esigned to evaluate the effect of a 15-day Tiorfan (racecadotril) treatment
on the incidence and severity of irinotecan-induced delayed diarrhea. One
hundred thirty-six patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who failed to
respond to a 5-fluorouracil-based treatment received 714 cycles of irinote
can. The patients were randomly allocated either to group A (68 patients) a
nd received Tiorfan (300 mg/day) from DO to D15 or to group B (68 patients)
with no prophylactic treatment. Delayed diarrhea occurred in 197 of 355 cy
cles (558) in Group A and 203 of 344 cycles (59%) in Group B. grade III-IV
diarrhea was reported in 17 of 40 compliant patients (42%) in group A and 3
1 of 68 evaluable patients (45%) in group B. No difference was observed bet
ween the two groups for delayed diarrhea characteristics, incidence, or sev
erity. The response rate in 99 evaluable patients was 12.1% (6.4%-20.2%). T
his study has shown that Tiorfan given prophylactically at 300 mg/day has n
o effect on delayed diarrhea.