Ga. Bohmig et al., Role of humoral immune reactions as target for antirejection therapy in recipients of a spousal-donor kidney graft, AM J KIDNEY, 35(4), 2000, pp. 667-673
Excellent graft outcome has been reported for spousal-donor kidney transpla
ntation. In husband-to-wife transplantation, however, a tendency toward inf
erior graft survival has been described for recipients who were previously
pregnant. In our series of spousal-kidney transplantations (nine transplant
ations; three female recipients), actual graft survival is 100% (median obs
ervation time, 339 days). Five patients experienced early allograft rejecti
on. In four transplant recipients, rejection was easily reversible by conve
ntional antirejection therapy. In a multiparous recipient, however, mild in
terstitial allograft rejection associated with early graft dysfunction was
resistant to anticellular treatment (antilymphocyte antibody, tacrollmus re
scue therapy). The particular finding of polymorphonuclear neutrophils in p
eritubular capillaries and the finding of diffuse capillary deposits of the
complement split product, C4d, in a posttransplantation biopsy specimen su
ggested a role of antibody-mediated graft injury. Retrospective flow cytome
try cross-matching showed the presence of preformed immunoglobulin G (IgG)
antibodies to HLA class I antigens that were not detectable by pretransplan
tation lymphocytotoxic crossmatch testing or screening for panel reactive a
ntibodies. After transplantation, however, complement-fixing antibodies, al
so presumably triggered by reexposure to spousal donor HLA antigens, could
be detected in the patient's serum. These findings suggested antibody-media
ted allograft rejection and led to the initiation of immunoadsorption thera
py (14 sessions) with staphylococcal protein A. Selective removal of recipi
ent IgG resulted in complete reversal of graft dysfunction. Our findings su
ggest that in husband-to-wife transplantation, donor-specific antibodies, p
resumably triggered by previous pregnancies, might occasionally induce sust
ained allograft dysfunction. Thus, in this particular setting, a detailed i
mmunologic and histopathologic work-up regarding antibody-mediated allograf
t dysfunction is warranted because immunoadsorption may be a highly effecti
ve treatment modality. (C) 2000 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.