Biological evaluation of undifferentiated carcinoma of the esophagus

Citation
M. Matsumoto et al., Biological evaluation of undifferentiated carcinoma of the esophagus, ANN SURG O, 7(3), 2000, pp. 204-209
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
Journal title
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
ISSN journal
10689265 → ACNP
Volume
7
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
204 - 209
Database
ISI
SICI code
1068-9265(200004)7:3<204:BEOUCO>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Background: Patients with undifferentiated carcinoma of the esophagus (UEC) are rare and have a poor prognosis compared with those with differentiated squamous cell carcinomas (DECs). We compared clinicopathological and biolo gical Features of UEC and DEC, with emphasis on markers for epithelial cell origin. proliferation, and cell-cell adhesion. Methods: Seven patients with UEC were compared with 21 with DEC. Immunohiso chemical studies were performed by using monoclonal antibodies to cytokerat in, epithelial membrane antigen, p53, p21(WAF1/C1P1), Ki-67, E-cadherin, de smoglein-1. and thrombomodulin. Results: Patients with UEC had a poorer prognosis because of hematogenous m etastasis at the time of presentation (mean survival, 6.5 +/- 6.2 vs. 35.5 +/- 28.9 months: P < .05), Immunohistochemical findings for cytokeratin and epithelial membrane antigen suggest that some UECs had epithelial origins. The following immunohistochemical profile of UEC was consistent with its h ighly malignant properties: (1) reduced or negative expression of cell-cell adhesion molecules such as E-cadherin, desmoglein-1, and thrombomodulin, ( 2) high positive rate for p53 and Ki-67, and (3) negative expression of p21 (WAF1/CIP1). Conclusions: The immunohistochemical findings for UEC showed its high cell- proliferative activity and a high potential for metastasis. Clinical featur es of UEC were supported by the results of immunohistochemical Endings.