Increasing pressure to improve low-performing schools-particularly those in
central cities serving disadvantaged and minority students-has led to a ho
st of reform efforts. This article focuses on a strategy that involves take
overs of troubled schools or entire systems by mayors, state legislatures,
or control boards. Following the takeover of the Jersey City, New Jersey, s
chools in 1989, at least partial control of schools has been taken from ele
cted boards in Chicago, Baltimore, Cleveland, Washington, D.C., and Detroit
. Discussed in this article are some of the major issues involved with take
overs, including arguments for and against the practice, the policy questio
ns it raises, and the all-important role race has played in the debate. The
authors close with thoughts for evaluating the effectiveness of this incre
asingly popular, yet unproven, attempt at reforming low-achieving schools.