Differences in immunoreactivity of estrogen receptor (ER) in tamoxifen-sensitive and -resistant breast carcinomas: preclinical and first clinical investigations
H. Naundorf et al., Differences in immunoreactivity of estrogen receptor (ER) in tamoxifen-sensitive and -resistant breast carcinomas: preclinical and first clinical investigations, BREAST CANC, 60(1), 2000, pp. 81-92
Inherited or acquired tamoxifen resistance is a major constraint in the end
ocrinological treatment of breast carcinomas. We developed an enzyme-immuno
assay that discriminates between tamoxifen-sensitive and -resistant tumors.
The procedure was established and standardized using two xenografted breas
t carcinomas - 3366 (highly sensitive to tamoxifen) and 3366/TAM (acquired
tamoxifen resistance). The latter model was developed by treatment of 3366
tumor-bearing nude mice during serial passaging over 3 years with tamoxifen
. Both lines were estrogen receptor (ER) positive (101 or 82 fmol/mg protei
n), and revealed no differences in the nucleotide sequences of the hormone
binding domain of the ER protein. However, while in the sensitive tumors an
upregulation of ER levels was registered after estradiol treatment of tumo
r bearing nude mice, the ER expression in the resistant line remained uncha
nged. The tamoxifen sensitive and -resistant breast carcinoma 3366 differed
, additionally, in their immunoreactivity of ER to mAB H222. While an incub
ation with estradiol or tamoxifen of immobilized ER prepared from cytosols
of the sensitive tumors 3366 led to a significant increase in immunoreactiv
ity, samples of resistant tumors failed in the exposition of additional imm
unologically reactive epitopes. These results were the basis for the develo
pment of an assay for determination of the tamoxifen response in patients.
Our retrospective results with 38 breast tumors from a tumor bank indicated
that patients with an increase of immunoreactivity of ER more rarely had a
recurrence while under going tamoxifen therapy compared with patients expe
cting no increase. However, the data indicate interesting changes occurring
with the ER of tam-resistant tumors that are to be explained by further mu
tational or protein-chemical analysis.