We. Aldeen et al., Comparison of the TOX A/B test to a cell culture cytotoxicity assay for the detection of Clostridium difficile in stools, DIAG MICR I, 36(4), 2000, pp. 211-213
The TOX A/B Test (Techlab, Blacksburg, VA, USA) was compared to cell cultur
e cytotoxicity assay on 1109 consecutive diarrheal stool samples collected
from patients with the presumptive diagnosis of Clostridium difficile disea
se. The TOX A/B Test is an enzyme immunoassay in a microtiter format that d
etects both toxins A and B. The procedure used for this study takes approxi
mately 1.5 h to perform. Cell culture cytoxicity was performed by using a f
ibroblast cell line in a microtiter format read at 4 h, 24 h, and 48 h.
One hundred ninety-four of the 1109 samples were positive by the "gold stan
dard" cytoxicity assay, whereas 189 were positive by EIA. There was a 98.5%
agreement between the two assays. When compared to the cytoxicity assay, t
he EIA had an initial sensitivity of 94.3% and a specificity of 99.3%. Howe
ver, after resolution of six discrepants using another ELISA for toxin A de
tection the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive valu
es for the TOX A/B test are as follows: 94.5%; 100%; 100%; 98.8%. The corre
sponding values for the cytotoxicity assay are: 97%; 100%; 100%; and 99.3%.
This test seems to have excellent sensitivity and specificity as compared
to an in-house cell culture cytotoxicity assay. It is sensitive enough to u
se as a stand-alone test for the detection of C. difficile toxin in laborat
ories that do not have cell culture cytotoxicity testing capability. (C) 20
00 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.