Several Latin American countries managed to introduce comprehensive structu
ral adjustment programs after the debt crisis of the 1980s, which resulted
in macroeconomic stability and relatively high growth rates during most of
the 1990s. In recent years, these achievements have been challenged by the
Asian crisis. However, there are significant differences in how tie crisis
has affected individual Latin American countries. The purpose of this artic
le is to describe the effects of the Asian crisis in Chile, Argentina, and
Brazil against th backdrop of the various national reform programs of the p
ast decade. The Chilean structural adjustment program was the most successf
ul, and the country has the largest freedom to choose adjustment policies t
oday. The challenge is to find the right combination of policies to maintai
n growth without generating inflation and macroeconomic instability. Argent
ina's scope for adjustment policy is limited by the country's currency boar
d and the convertibility between the peso and the US dollar. The main probl
em is the risk for widespread unemployment in a situation where exchange ra
te adjustments cannot be used as a policy instrument. The Brazilian adjustm
ent programs of the past years were not as strict as those in the neighbori
ng countries, and the persistent public budget deficit constitutes a major
problem. in the short run, there is a need for tight monetary policy, and i
t may therefore be difficult to combine price stability with reasonable gro
wth rates.