A critical review of biological parameters used to indicate pollutant impac
t on soil quality was conducted. These parameters mention some soil inverte
brates. The value of an indicative organism depends on its life expectancy,
life style and specific importance. Nematodes, mites, collembolans, enchyt
raeids, earthworms, isopods and molluscs are good potential biological indi
cators. Biological indicators of bioaccumulation and biological indicators
of effects (toxicological and ecological) can bq distinguished. Bioaccumula
tion studies are difficult to interpret, as wide variations could be found,
depending on taxonomic group, habitat, organ studied, soil type or even po
llutant type. Some groups, such as Collembola, require in depth bioaccumula
tion studies. It is suggested to use a pool of macro-concentrators, includi
ng at least some earthworm, isopod and gastropod species. Toxicological ind
icators have been well studied and their lethal and sublethal pollutant eff
ects are well known. However, studies have focused on only a few species, s
uch as the earthworm Eisenia foetida or the collembolan Folsomia candida. T
hese studies should be extended to other zoological groups, as well as to s
everal species from the same group, to generate a representative test batte
ry. Exposure biomarkers and physiological change studies should be emphasis
ed, as they act as very early warning systems of contamination. Data are cu
rrently lacking on how soil biological processes malfunction due to polluti
on. We need to explore the links between pollutant effects on soil fauna an
d pollutant effects on soil functioning. Concerning ecological indicators,
studies should develop sampling techniques and parameters, which are specif
ic to ecotoxicological goals. Before-after impact control procedures should
be carried out, to eliminate the background noise of the study site and on
ly evaluate the influence of pollutants. On the other hand, ecological indi
ces, such as taxonomic diversity or richness, should be used carefully espe
cially concerning chronic pollution. Effects of pollutants on biological cy
cle studies seem very promising, but need further information on the life h
istory strategies of many species. Furthermore, the pollutant tolerance of
rare species should be considered. The different types of biological indica
tors yield complementary information on pollutant effects. They all need st
andard procedures. In this context, studies should be extended and diversif
ied, and associate bioaccumulation, toxicological and ecological indicators
to provide better information on soil quality. (C) 2000 Editions scientifi
ques et medicales Elsevier SAS.