This paper presents an interim assessment of Housing Action Trusts (HATs)-s
pecial purpose, limited duration, Government agencies-charged with the task
of comprehensively regenerating run-down housing estates in England. HATs'
track record remains under-analysed despite the large sums of public money
involved and their relevance to the latest experiments in estate regenerat
ion. The paper briefly profiles the six HATs' designated areas, then assess
es the degree to which they have achieved their main objectives. HATs have
thus far had mixed success. They have attached greater priority to employme
nt and training and quality of life measures, community empowerment and sus
tainability than earlier estate regeneration programmes. However, they have
still devoted the lion's share of their resources to housing investment an
d the question remains whether they have gone far enough in tackling the de
ep-roofed social and economic problems of deprived neighbourhoods. HATs hav
e proved relatively expensive compared with alternative methods of injectin
g new investment into social housing, largely because of their emphasis upo
n durable design, good space standards and energy efficiency and also resid
ent empowerment and wider measures. Only time will tell whether the extra c
ost is justified.