A multinational comparison of aphasia management practices

Citation
Rc. Katz et al., A multinational comparison of aphasia management practices, INT J LAN C, 35(2), 2000, pp. 303-314
Citations number
47
Categorie Soggetti
Rehabilitation
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS
ISSN journal
13682822 → ACNP
Volume
35
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
303 - 314
Database
ISI
SICI code
1368-2822(200004/06)35:2<303:AMCOAM>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
The effect of restructuring of healthcare on the quality, quantity, and nat ure of aphasia management is largely unknown. The current study is the firs t to examine access, diagnostic, treatment, and discharge patterns of patie nts with aphasia in Australia, Canada, the UK, the US private sector (US-Pr ivate), and the US Veterans Health Administration in the Department of Vete rans Affairs (US-VA). The authors developed a 37-item survey to be completed by clinicians workin g with aphasic patients. The survey focused on eight areas: access to care, evaluation procedures, group treatment, number and duration of treatment s essions, limitations of the number of sessions, termination of treatment, f ollow-up practices, and resumption of treatment. 394 surveys were distribut ed and 175 were returned completed (44% return rate). Respondents represent ed a range of ages, work experiences, and work settings. There was consider able consistency among respondents from our five healthcare systems. Result s suggest that patients may be routinely denied treatment in direct contrad iction to the research literature. Just as we carefully monitor the progres s of patients receiving our treatment, we are obliged to monitor the effect s of managed care on our patients, fellow clinicians, and our profession.