The limits of laissez-innover: Canada's automation controversy, 1955-1969

Authors
Citation
P. Roper, The limits of laissez-innover: Canada's automation controversy, 1955-1969, J CAN STUD, 34(3), 1999, pp. 87-105
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
General
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CANADIAN STUDIES-REVUE D ETUDES CANADIENNES
ISSN journal
00219495 → ACNP
Volume
34
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
87 - 105
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-9495(199923)34:3<87:TLOLCA>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
The introduction of numerical-control processing and increased computerizat ion in the mid-1950s-"automation"-was met with widespread fear that "thinki ng machines" were about to cause massive unemployment. While hardly the fir st time in history that people viewed machines as threats, this particular technological controversy was characterized by a ubiquitous belief in the r eality and necessity of unbridled progress. The underlying laissez-innover mentality meant that even those most likely to be critical of the effects o f technological change such as organized labour accepted its "inevitability ." the crux of the controversy was that while the word automation fell into disuse by the late 1960s, the central question is generated-namely how to maintain economic security in the face of rapid technological change-has re mained central to recent public policy debates on "economic restructuring" and "globalization." As such, the automation controversy has never really e nded, although the word itself no longer leads to media commentary.