Because of the known differences in bone mineral density (BMD) of the domin
ant and nondominant forearms, it has been customary to measure BMD of the n
ondominant forearm to reduce variance. However, it is less clear whether su
ch systematic differences exist between BMD of the two hips. Accordingly, w
e measured E-MD of both hips and the spine in 131 consecutive white women w
ho presented to a community-based private practitioner for evaluation and a
dvice on osteoporosis.
There was a highly significant correlation between BMD of the two hips at t
he femoral neck, trochanter, and Ward's triangle (r = 0.91, 0.93, and 0.89,
respectively; p < 0.0001 for all three sites) and also between BMD at vari
ous measurement sites in the hip and the spine BMD (p < 0.0001), Although t
here was no significant difference between the right and left femoral neck
BMD, there were small (approximately 1-2.5%) but significant differences be
tween BMD of the two hips at the trochanter and Ward's triangle (p = 0.008
and 0.005, respectively). The left hip BMD was consistently higher than the
right hip BMD at all measurement sites. Because of the small sample size o
f left-handed persons, we were unable to determine the influence of dominan
t handedness on hip BMD. We concluded the following: (1) BMDs of the two hi
ps are highly correlated at relevant measurement sites; (2) there does not
appear to be a dominant hip as there is dominant forearm; (3) because of st
rong agreement between BMD of the two hips, there is little justification t
o measure both hips in routine clinical practice.