Objective, The etiology of giant cell arteritis (GCA) is unknown, but its s
udden onset and the wide variation in incidence reported from various parts
of the world suggest a genetic predisposition and/or the influence of envi
ronmental factors, such as infectious agents or a seasonal effect. We analy
zed the influence of season on GCA in our area over the period 1985-97, as
well as the possible association between infection and onset.
Methods. Retrospective study of 143 cases of GCA diagnosed from 1985 to 199
7. To evaluate season al variation in disease onset, the month of onset of
the first symptoms related to GCA was used to calculate season-specific inc
idence rates. Differences between season incidence rates were assessed by c
hi-square test. To test for an association between infection and GC:A onset
, we considered only infections that occurred within 2 months before the on
set of disease. Because of the difficulty in determining whether an infecti
on was present using only the clinical and laboratory data recorded in pati
ents' medical charts, we categorized the likelihood of patients having infe
ction into 3 groups: no infection, probable infection, and definite infecti
on.
Results. Between 1985 and 1997 (both years included), a total of 143 patien
ts (88 women, 55 men) were diagnosed with GCA. Of these, 85 had isolated po
lymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), 22 had temporal arteritis (TA) without PMR, and
36 had PMR associated with TA. The main clinical features in our populatio
n were similar to those reported in other studies. We found no seasonal var
iation in disease onset during the 13 year period. Moreover, only one (0.7%
) of 143 patients was categorized as a probable infection, whereas definite
infection was not observed in any case. From these results, the hypothesis
of an infectious cause for GCA seems highly improbable.
Conclusion. We were unable to observe a seasonal pattern or an association
between infection and the onset of GCA.