Existential second-order logic (ESO)and monadic second-order logic (MSO) ha
ve attracted much interest in logic and computer science. ESO isa much more
expressive logic over successor structures than MSG. However, little was k
nown about the relationship between MSO and syntactic fragments of ESO. We
shed light on this issue by completely characterizing this relationship for
the prefix classes of ESO over strings, (i.e., finite successor structures
). Moreover, we determine the complexity of model checking over strings, fo
r all ESO-prefix classes. Let ESO(2) denote the prefix class containing all
sentences of the shape There Exists RQ phi, where R is a list of predicate
variables, Q is a first-order quantifier prefix from the prefix set L, and
phi is quantifier-free. We show that ESO(There Exists*For All There Exists
*) and ESO(There Exists*For All For All) are the maximal standard ESO-prefi
x classes contained in MSG, thus expressing only regular languages. We furt
her prove the following dichotomy theorem: An ESO prefix-class either expre
sses only regular languages (and is thus in MSO), ur it expresses some NP-c
omplete languages. We also give a precise characterization of those ESO-pre
fix classes that are equivalent to MSO over strings, and of the ESO-prefix
classes which are closed under complementation on strings.