M. Bilge et al., Transesophageal echocardiography assessment of left atrial appendage function in untreated systemic hypertensive patients in sinus rhythm, J AM S ECHO, 13(4), 2000, pp. 271-276
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
To assess left atrial appendage (LAA) function in hypertensive patients wit
hout treatment, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was performed in 46
hypertensive patients in sinus rhythm, aged 40 to 55 years, and in 16 contr
ol subjects (group I) without cardiovascular disease, aged 41 to 54 years.
The hypertensive patients were divided into 2 groups according to left vent
ricular (LV) systolic function: group II, the group with normal LV systolic
function (ejection fraction 0.63 +/- 0.08), and group III, the group with
LV systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction 0.39 +/- 0.05). The LAA late emp
tying velocities (EVs) were significantly reduced in the hypertensive subgr
oups compared with the control group (P < .001), but no significant differe
nce in the LAAEV was found between groups Il and III. The LAAEV in the hype
rtensive patients had a significant negative correlation with diastolic blo
od pressure, systolic blood pressure, and left atrial (LA) diameter. The ma
ximal LAA areas were significantly larger in the hypertensive subgroups tha
n in the control group (P < .05). No significant difference in LAA maximal
area existed between groups II and III. The maximal LAA area in the hyperte
nsive patients had a significant positive correlation with diastolic blood
pressure, systolic blood pressure, and LA diameter, but a significant negat
ive correlation with LV ejection fraction. With TEE, LA spontaneous echocar
diographic contrast (SEC) was present in 6 (43%) of 14 patients in group II
I (P < .01) and in 7 (22%) of 32 patients in group II (P < .05). No signifi
cant difference in the occurrence of LASEC was found between groups II and
III. Left atrial appendage thrombi by TEE were observed in 4 (29%) of 14 pa
tients in group III (P < .05) and in 4 (13%) of 32 patients in group II (P
= not significant). No significant difference in the occurrence of LAA thro
mbus existed between groups II and III. In conclusion, in patients with unt
reated hypertension, marked elevation of afterload imposed on the left atri
um may involve both the left atrium and the LAA, resulting in impairment of
LAA function. This condition may worsen with subsequent occurrence of SEC
and later, thrombus formation. Therefore assessment of LAA function may be
important even in the hypertensive patient in sinus rhythm.