Estimating sizes of wild pig populations in the North and Central Coast regions of California

Citation
Ra. Sweitzer et al., Estimating sizes of wild pig populations in the North and Central Coast regions of California, J WILDL MAN, 64(2), 2000, pp. 531-543
Citations number
54
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences
Journal title
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT
ISSN journal
0022541X → ACNP
Volume
64
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
531 - 543
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-541X(200004)64:2<531:ESOWPP>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
We developed a mark-sighting approach with automatic camera systems and ass essed the size and density of wild pig (Sus scrofa) populations in the Nort h and Central Coast regions of California in 1994 and 1995. Eighty and 149 wild pigs were captured and tagged at 4 and 6 study sites in 1994 and 1995, respectively. Of those animals, 202 (88%) were subsequently sighted among over 3,000 photographs of wild pigs obtained from 54 camera stations. Sight ing rates for both tagged and nontagged wild pigs were similar between year s and averaged 2.8 +/- 0.5 and 2.8 +/- 0.4 wild pigs/camera-station night, respectively Sighting rates for all wild pigs during the study averaged 5.7 +/- 0.8 wild pigs/camera-station night. Mark-sighting data analyzed with p rogram NOREMARK provided estimates of population size, and nar row 95% conf idence intervals (95% CI) for most research sites suggested we obtained suf ficient sightings for reliable estimates of size of populations. It also pr oved possible to identify nontagged wild pigs in photographs for determinin g minimum population sizes, and the 95% CI from mark-sighting estimates enc ompassed the minimum population sizes for 8 of 10 study sites. An important factor influencing the reliability of population estimates was the proport ion of tagged animals resighted. At one site where few tagged animals were sighted, 95% CIs were large and did not encompass the minimum population es timate. Mean population densities ranged from 0.7 to 3.8 wild pigs/ km(2), comparable to previous research on wild pigs in the regions we studied. Den sities increased from 1994 to 1995, potentially related to higher rainfall and increased forage availability in 1995. Also, densities were lower in ar eas with relatively high hunting pressure, suggesting that sport hunting ma y be effective at reducing wild pigs numbers in some areas.