Yr. Guo et al., Four-dimensional variational data assimilation of heterogeneous mesoscale observations for a strong convective case, M WEATH REV, 128(3), 2000, pp. 619-643
On 19 September 1996, a squall line stretching from Nebraska to Texas with
intense embedded convection moved eastward across the Kansas-Oklahoma area,
where special observations were taken as part of a Water Vapor Intensive O
bserving Period sponsored by the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement program.
This provided a unique opportunity to test mesoscale data assimilation str
ategies for a strong convective event. In this study, a series of real-data
assimilation experiments is performed using the MM5 four-dimensional varia
tional data assimilation (4DVAR) system with a full physics adjoint. With a
grid size of 20 km and 15 vertical layers, the MM5-4DVAR system successful
ly assimilated wind profiler, hourly rainfall, surface dewpoint, and ground
-based GPS precipitable water vapor data. The MM5-4DVAR system was able to
reproduce the observed rainfall in terms of precipitation pattern and amoun
t, and substantially reduced the model errors when verified against indepen
dent observations.
Additional data assimilation experiments were conducted to assess the relat
ive importance of different types of mesoscale observations on the results
of assimilation. In terms of the assimilation models ability to recover the
vertical structure of moisture and in reproducing the rainfall pattern and
amount, the wind profiler data have the maximum impact. The ground-based G
PS data have a significant impact on the rainfall prediction, but have rela
tively small influence on the recovery of moisture structure. On the contra
ry, the surface dewpoint data are very useful for the recovery of the moist
ure structure, but have relatively small impact on rainfall prediction. The
assimilation of rainfall data is very important in preserving the precipit
ation structure of the squall line. All the data are found to be useful in
this mesoscale data assimilation experiment.
Issues related to the assimilation time window, weighting of different type
s of observations, and the use of accurate observation operator are also di
scussed.