Ja. Henry et Ca. Rivas, CONSTRAINTS ON ANTIDEPRESSANT PRESCRIBING AND PRINCIPLES OF COST-EFFECTIVE ANTIDEPRESSANT USE .2. COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSES, PharmacoEconomics, 11(6), 1997, pp. 515-537
Cost-effectiveness studies are a useful tool in drug-choice decisions.
They are appropriate when alternative therapies have different levels
of effectiveness, as with antidepressants. The calculation of cost ef
fectiveness is similar to that used by some authors to determine wheth
er a drug should be included in a formulary, so it clearly has immedia
te practical application and potential acceptability. However, the act
ual acceptability of cost-effectiveness studies has been hampered by a
lack of conformity over study objectives, methodology and use of avai
lable data, and this significantly affects results. Studies that focus
on the same location and setting, and conducted at the same time, fre
quently provide different results in their conclusions, depending on t
he assumptions and viewpoints, and the effects of sampling error. For
example. dosage can affect purchase price calculations, but also compl
iance and efficacy, which are important considerations. Moreover, conc
lusions based on cost disadvantages of new drugs are not appropriate f
or planning fur the future, since a drug's market price tends to fail
with time and increasing demand. Appropriate use of outcome measures i
s important, and treatment failures, as well as successes, should be c
onsidered. Cost-effectiveness analysis has been used to demonstrate an
important point: even when the appropriate use of antidepressants and
speciality care increases medical costs, it improves value for money.
A variety of drugs for one indication should be available to the pres
criber, as the most cost-effective one may differ between patient subp
opulations.Many costs of morbidity, adverse effects and secondary effe
cts of antidepressants remain to be properly quantified, but are likel
y to have an important influence on cost effectiveness. These costs ar
e likely to be higher fur tricyclic antidepressants than the newer rev
ersible inhibitors of monoamine oxidase and selective serotonin (5-hyd
roxytryptamine: 5-HT) reuptake inhibitors. Costing in some areas of he
alth is relatively straightforward. Depression is among the most diffi
cult areas to cost because of its gradation in severity, its chronic a
nd recurrent nature, and its subtle effects on working capacity. Quant
ification of differences resulting from the use of different drugs has
many pitfalls. Until now, each cost analysis of depression has differ
ed from the last, and most have placed excessive reliance on poorly su
bstantiated and hypothetical assumptions. More in-depth studies are re
quired to define the most cost-effective policies for recommendation t
o healthcare decision-makers and antidepressant drug prescribers. Comp
liance, adverse effects, and safety in overdose are important factors.
The impact uf indirect costs also needs to be addressed.