POSTTRANSPLANT LYMPHOPROLIFERATIVE DISEASE IN KIDNEY-TRANSPLANT PATIENTS IN THE NEW IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE ERA

Citation
G. Ciancio et al., POSTTRANSPLANT LYMPHOPROLIFERATIVE DISEASE IN KIDNEY-TRANSPLANT PATIENTS IN THE NEW IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE ERA, Clinical transplantation, 11(3), 1997, pp. 243-249
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,Transplantation
Journal title
ISSN journal
09020063
Volume
11
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
243 - 249
Database
ISI
SICI code
0902-0063(1997)11:3<243:PLDIKP>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
Although the kidney transplant program at this center has been active for the past 18 yr, five out of the seven cases of post-transplant lym phoma in kidney transplant patients were observed over the past 2 yr. During this period, we have shifted from cyclosporine to tacrolimus (F K506 or prograf) for maintenance immunosuppression and for rescue ther apy. We have also introduced mycophenolate (RS - 61443) and have conti nued an antibody induction regimen in the immediate postoperative peri od. FK506 is 50-100 times more potent than cyclosporine. We have repor ted a decreased incidence of rejection, improved graft survival, and a general optimalization of patient survival with these newer regimens. Nonetheless, five cases of post-transplant lymphoma out of 233 kidney transplants (2.1%) performed during this time period (December 1993 t o December 1995) occurred between 3 months to 1 yr after the transplan t. Four of the five patients are still alive between 12 and 24 months after the diagnosis of lymphoma was made, All were without evidence of ongoing disease. Three of the five have grafts with excellent functio n for longer than 18 months after transplantation, while one is margin al and one patient expired on dialysis. The third and fourth patients had severe rejection before the diagnosis of PTLD was made, While the occurrence of five cases of post-transplant lymphoma over a 2 yr perio d is alarming, this is still within the 2-4% incidence of post-transpl ant lymphoma that has been reported in the literature in kidney transp lant patients. Our results probably reflect the increasing potency of our immunosuppressive protocols but do not show any increase in the ag gressiveness of this entity of post-transplant lymphoma during the con tinued follow up.