Z. Rosenhek, Migration regimes, intra-state conflicts, and the politics of exclusion and inclusion: Migrant workers in the Israeli welfare state, SOCIAL PROB, 47(1), 2000, pp. 49-67
This articles examines the politics of exclusion and inclusion of migrant w
orkers in the welfare state within the context of the migration regime domi
nant in Israel. The study shows that while the policy implemented is marked
by strong exclusionary practices, some state agencies endorse and implemen
t inclusionary approaches that contradict the basic assumptions of the migr
ation regime. This inconsistency is analyzed considering the distinct insti
tutional interests of different state agencies. This conceptualization of t
he stare as a heterogeneous institutional complex sheds light on the comple
xities of the politics of exclusion and inclusion. It is concluded that, ev
en in cases in which the migration regime is strongly associated with restr
ictive ethno-national conceptions of membership, certain state agencies dev
elop institutional interests that lead to inclusionary approaches. These ap
proaches, in turn, can create openings leading to the partial inclusion of
migrant workers in the welfare state. At a more general level, the study co
ntributes to the examination of policy innovations that depart from the pri
nciples of dominant institutional settings, arguing that Mew interests and
agendas developed by state agencies play a crucial role these processes.