The ascription of normative mental states is an integral part of the psycho
logy of development and personality. Pragmatic rules for the ascription of
mental states are outlined and a distinction is made between direct and cou
nterdefined mental states. According to these rules, counter defined mental
states can only be ascribed to persons in a meaningful way when certain co
nditions hold. Violations of the rules are called pseudo-ascriptions. Six c
ounterdefined, groups of mental states are discussed: secure, self-confiden
t, authentic, free, intentional and identity. It is argued that certain psy
che-social conditions create the need for ascriptions of these mental state
s, and that pseudoascriptions give rise to Cartesian narratives of the self
. The rules for the ascription of counterdefined states has implications fo
r the universality claims of normative descriptions of developmental psycho
logy.