This comment on Parker's 'Against Postmodernism: Psychology in Cultural Con
text' (Parker, 1998) contextualizes Parker's 'againstism' (critical) stance
. Parker characterizes postmodernism as theoretical play that has gone too
far. Having exhausted its progressive potential, it's become a breeding gro
und for reactionary ideas now threatening psychology and a radical politica
l agenda. Parker, recognizing that what he fears postmodernism has spawned
are products of modernism, employs 'dialectical critique' to historically c
ontextualize postmodernism and its dangers. as postmodernists Parker takes
to task, the authors argue that the relevant points of difference between h
im and them have more to do with their differing institutional locations an
d conception/practices of dialectics than with postmodernism.