Western understanding of the post-war evolution of states in advanced capit
alist societies envisions a moment of fundamental transition beginning in t
he mid 1970s and indexed by reduced government spending, the privatisation
of public services and increased inequality among local governments, Regula
tion theory sees the process as a transition from a Keynesian welfare state
to a Schumpeterian workfare state necessitated by the shift from a Fordist
to a post-Fordist regime of capital accumulation. Japan, a member of the O
ECD, and the world's second-largest economy, fits neither the political-eco
nomic trends nor the model put forward by Western regulation theorists, Jap
an has not experienced the decline in state spending, the privatisation of
public activity or the rising inequality among local governments that chara
cterises Western OECD nations, The Japanese have selectively incorporated K
eynesian and Schumpeterian ideas, but in a spirit much closer to that of wr
iters associated with the German historical school, and always within a fra
mework rooted in Japan's own historical traditions and exigencies, We docum
ent Japan's departure from the Western model of state restructuring and exp
lore the theoretical implications.