Descriptive analysis of the nature and extent of bullying behavior in a maximum-security prison

Citation
Ca. Ireland et Jl. Ireland, Descriptive analysis of the nature and extent of bullying behavior in a maximum-security prison, AGGR BEHAV, 26(3), 2000, pp. 213-223
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology,"Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR
ISSN journal
0096140X → ACNP
Volume
26
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
213 - 223
Database
ISI
SICI code
0096-140X(2000)26:3<213:DAOTNA>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
This aim of this study was to investigate the nature and extent of direct a nd indirect bullying in a maximum-security prison and to assess prisoners' attitudes toward victims of bullying. A total of 194 adult male prisoners c ompleted the Direct and Indirect Prisoner Behavior Checklist (DIPC) [Irelan d (1998): University of Central Lancashire; Ireland (1999a): Aggressive Beh avior] and a modified version of the Rigby and Slee [1991: J Social Psychol 131:615-627] provictim scale. The results showed that more than half of th e prisoners sampled had been bullied in the past week. Only a small number of prisoners could be classified as either a pure bully or a pure victim, w ith almost half classified as both a bully and a victim. The most frequent types of bullying used were psychological/verbal and indirect forms. No sig nificant differences were found between pure bullies, bully/victims, pure v ictims, and the not involved groups' attitudes toward the victims of bullyi ng. These findings hold implications for anti-bullying programs that fail t o fully consider the prevalence of indirect forms of bullying and that an i ndividual can be both a bully and a victim. (C) 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.