Ca. Ireland et Jl. Ireland, Descriptive analysis of the nature and extent of bullying behavior in a maximum-security prison, AGGR BEHAV, 26(3), 2000, pp. 213-223
This aim of this study was to investigate the nature and extent of direct a
nd indirect bullying in a maximum-security prison and to assess prisoners'
attitudes toward victims of bullying. A total of 194 adult male prisoners c
ompleted the Direct and Indirect Prisoner Behavior Checklist (DIPC) [Irelan
d (1998): University of Central Lancashire; Ireland (1999a): Aggressive Beh
avior] and a modified version of the Rigby and Slee [1991: J Social Psychol
131:615-627] provictim scale. The results showed that more than half of th
e prisoners sampled had been bullied in the past week. Only a small number
of prisoners could be classified as either a pure bully or a pure victim, w
ith almost half classified as both a bully and a victim. The most frequent
types of bullying used were psychological/verbal and indirect forms. No sig
nificant differences were found between pure bullies, bully/victims, pure v
ictims, and the not involved groups' attitudes toward the victims of bullyi
ng. These findings hold implications for anti-bullying programs that fail t
o fully consider the prevalence of indirect forms of bullying and that an i
ndividual can be both a bully and a victim. (C) 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.