The use of a remote stripping sensor for the determination of copper and mercury in the Lagoon of Venice

Citation
S. Daniele et al., The use of a remote stripping sensor for the determination of copper and mercury in the Lagoon of Venice, ANALYST, 125(4), 2000, pp. 731-735
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Chemistry & Analysis","Spectroscopy /Instrumentation/Analytical Sciences
Journal title
ANALYST
ISSN journal
00032654 → ACNP
Volume
125
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
731 - 735
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-2654(200004)125:4<731:TUOARS>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
The determination of the labile fraction and total concentration of copper and mercury in different sites of the Lagoon of Venice, using a remote elec trochemical sensor based on a gold fiber microelectrode, is presented. The remote sensor was used in conjunction with either potentiometric stripping analysis (PSA) or square-wave anodic stripping voltammetry (SWASV). The res ults obtained show that using PSA, in situ detection of the labile fraction of both metals can be achieved down to 0.22 and 0.04 ppb for copper and me rcury, respectively. Under these conditions the relative standard deviation (RSD) was within 8 and 10% for copper and mercury, respectively. In contra st, no reliable in situ data could be obtained with SWASV. This is attribut ed to the lack of suitable software for baseline treatment with this techni que. Laboratory measurements were employed for total concentration determin ation of the metal ions. The total concentration was obtained after acidifi cation of the sample to pH 1 with HCl. Under these conditions, the concentr ation of both copper and mercury increased by about one order of magnitude. This allowed the determination of the two ions by SWASV, whereas the overl ap of the stripping peaks of copper and mercury prevented their determinati on by PSA. The precision for the total concentration was also satisfactory, the RSD being 5 and 7% for copper and mercury, respectively. The effect of the matrix on the PSA and SWASV responses is discussed. Total concentratio ns determined by the anodic stripping technique are compared with those fou nd by atomic absorption spectrometry.