Correlation between physical measurements and dietary energy values of wheat for poultry and pigs

Authors
Citation
J. Wiseman, Correlation between physical measurements and dietary energy values of wheat for poultry and pigs, ANIM FEED S, 84(1-2), 2000, pp. 1-11
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences
Journal title
ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
ISSN journal
03778401 → ACNP
Volume
84
Issue
1-2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1 - 11
Database
ISI
SICI code
0377-8401(20000410)84:1-2<1:CBPMAD>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
A number of wheat samples were obtained for evaluation: for young poultry, 50 wheats (10 varieties each grown at five sites) with bushel weights/thous and grain weights ranging from 69.5 to 80.0 kg/hl and 34.6 to 59.3 g, respe ctively; for pigs (8 different varieties each grown at 2 sites) with bushel weights/thousand grain weights ranging from 71.0 to 81.5 kg/hl and 40.9 to 56.7 g, respectively. Apparent metabolisable energy (AME) and coefficient of metabolisability of gross energy (CAME) were determined with young broil ers; Digestible energy (DE) and coefficient of total tract apparent digesti bility (CTTAD) of gross energy were determined with growing finishing pigs. Wheat was added at a rate of 750 and 900 g/kg diet for poultry and pigs, r espectively, in a series of metabolism trials. AME values ranged from 8.49 to 12.45 MJ/kg DM and CAME from 0.491 to 0.702, DE values ranged from 14.55 to 16.07 MJ/kg DM and CTTAD from 0.848 to 0.890. There were significant di fferences between variety and site (together with interaction terms) in bot h, the physical and biological measurements, but not in a structured fashio n. There were no significant relationships between the two physical measure ments and any dietary energy value (either in terms of concentration or coe fficient), confirming previous work. The two lowest bushel weight wheats ha d among the highest AME values for poultry, confirming that evaluation of t he variability in nutritional value of wheat for poultry should only procee d against a background of detailed knowledge of genotype. Comparisons on th e basis of variety name alone appear inappropriate as individual varieties do not seem to respond in a uniform fashion. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. Al rights reserved.