Sj. Schapiro et al., A comparison of cell-mediated immune responses in rhesus macaques housed singly, in pairs, or in groups, APPL ANIM B, 68(1), 2000, pp. 67-84
A variety of psychosocial factors have been shown to influence immunologica
l responses in laboratory primates. The present investigation examined the
effects of social housing condition on cell-mediated immune responses, comp
aring rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) in three housing conditions (single,
pair, and group). Subjects included 12 adults of both sexes in each housin
g condition (N=36). Multiple blood samples (0, 4, 8, and 12 months) were co
llected for immunological analyses, including lymphocyte subsets, lymphocyt
e proliferation to pathogens and nonspecific mitogens, natural killer cell
activity, and cytokine production. CD4(+) to CD8(+) ratios differed signifi
cantly across housing conditions and singly caged subjects had significantl
y lower CD4(+)/CD8(+) after the 4-month timepoint than did socially housed
(pair and group) subjects. CD4(+) to CD8(+) ratios were positively correlat
ed within subjects, suggesting a trait-like aspect to this parameter. Lymph
ocyte proliferation responses to all four gastrointestinal pathogens differ
ed across housing conditions (at least at the 0.08 level), as did prolifera
tion responses to StaphA, and the production of cytokines (IFN-gamma, IL-2,
and IL-10). Proliferation responses of singly caged monkeys did not differ
from socially housed monkeys and the highest levels of both IFN-gamma and
IL-10 were produced by group housed subjects. The data demonstrate that soc
ial housing condition affects immune responses. While not unidirectional, t
hese effects generally suggest enhanced immune responses for socially house
d animals. Since rhesus monkeys live socially in nature, and the immune res
ponses of singly housed animals differed from those housed socially, there
is considerable motivation and justification for suggesting that the use of
singly housed rhesus macaques may complicate interpretations of normal imm
unological responses. This may have important implications for the manageme
nt, treatment, and selection of primate subjects for immunological studies.
(C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.