Comparison of sustained-release nifedipine and temperature biofeedback fortreatment of primary Raynaud phenomenon - Results from a randomized clinical trial with 1-year follow-up
Fm. Wigley et al., Comparison of sustained-release nifedipine and temperature biofeedback fortreatment of primary Raynaud phenomenon - Results from a randomized clinical trial with 1-year follow-up, ARCH IN MED, 160(8), 2000, pp. 1101-1108
Citations number
49
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Background: The efficacy and safety of sustained-release nifedipine for the
treatment of primary Raynaud phenomenon (RP) has not previously been demon
strated by a randomized, controlled trial. Temperature biofeedback has been
studied in patients with primary RP but not in a large multicenter control
led trial or compared with nifedipine therapy.
Objective: To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of sustained-release n
ifedipine and temperature biofeedback for the treatment of primary RP.
Participants and Methods: This is a randomized, controlled clinical trial,
double-masked for drug and placebo but not masked for temperature and contr
ol biofeedback. It included 313 persons with primary RP as defined by medic
al history, physical examination findings, normal nailfold capillaries, and
a history of 2 or more attacks per day during the previous cold season. Pa
rticipants were randomized to 1 of 4 treatment groups: (1) sustained-releas
e nifedipine, (2) pill placebo, (3) temperature biofeedback, or (4) control
(electromyographic) self-reported, color chart-verified RP attacks during
1 winter month approximately 1 year after initiation of treatment. Secondar
y outcome measures included verified attacks at 2 months, all attacks at 2
months and 1 year, and quality of life.
Results: Nifedipine-treated participants showed a 66% reduction in verified
attacks compared with placebo recipients (P<.001); temperature biofeedback
training did not reduce attacks significantly compared with control biofee
dback (P = .37). Comparison of nifedipine and temperature biofeedback treat
ments favored nifedipine use (P = .08); similar results were obtained for t
he secondary end points. Adverse effects resulted in discontinuation of nif
edipine treatment in 15% of participants.
Conclusions: Temperature biofeedback is not better than its control treatme
nt and is inferior to sustained-release nifedipine for treating primary RP,
whereas sustained-release nifedipine is a safe and effective treatment for
this disease.