Effect of storage and preservation methods on viability in transplantable human skin allografts

Citation
D. Bravo et al., Effect of storage and preservation methods on viability in transplantable human skin allografts, BURNS, 26(4), 2000, pp. 367-378
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
BURNS
ISSN journal
03054179 → ACNP
Volume
26
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
367 - 378
Database
ISI
SICI code
0305-4179(200006)26:4<367:EOSAPM>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
This study compared the metabolic activity of fresh skin samples to that of cadaver human skin allografts processed and stored by current tissue banki ng methods. We chose to use two metabolic assays as surrogate measures for viability in these grafts. Skin allografts stored either in liquid media at 4 degrees C for varying periods of time or stored by cryopreservation were quantitatively assessed for viability by tetrazolium reduction and oxygen consumption assays. These measurements were compared to viability assessmen ts of fresh autograft skin. Human cadaver skin grafts, after procurement an d just prior to further tissue bank processing, exhibited approximately 60% of the metabolic activity found in fresh skin samples obtained from living surgical donors. If allowed an overnight (18-24 h) incubation period at 37 degrees C, cadaver samples showed a recovery of their metabolic activity t o 95% of that found in the autograft skin samples. When stored in liquid me dia at 4 degrees C, the cadaver skin declined steadily in cellular metaboli c activity, arriving in less than 5 days storage at a measurement below tha t of cryopreserved skin. The cryopreserved skin was measured both immediate ly after thawing and dilution of cryoprotectant, as well as after equilibra tion and overnight incubation. Skin cryopreserved with dimethylsulfoxide Me 2SO retained higher viability than glycerol cryopreserved skin. Residual co ncentrations of cryoprotectants were determined following typical recommend ations for thawing and diluting skin allografts, The implications of these findings for transplantation and tissue banking are discussed. (C) 2000 Els evier Science Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.