The effect of self-set personal and assigned group goal setting on an indiv
idual's behaviour in 3- and 7-person groups confronted with a social dilemm
a was investigated. Participants (N = 274) earned between $1.82 and $4.94 b
y investing money in either a personal account or a group account. Serf-set
personal goals that were compatible with an assigned group goal led to hig
her group performance than self-set incompatibly high ("greedy") personal g
oals. Collective-efficacy in making money, outcome expectancies that cooper
ation with others leads to the attainment of the group's goal, and group go
al commitment correlated positively with group performance. Individuals in
7-person groups (N = 28) were less cooperative than those in 3-person group
s (N = 26). They had lower collective-efficacy, lower outcome expectancies,
and lower commitment to the group goal than did individuals in 3-person gr
oups. Furthermore, individual performance in 7-person groups was significan
tly lower than individual performance in 3-person groups. A social dilemma
appears to be a boundary condition for the normally positive effect of grou
p goal setting on group performance.