G. Scherer et al., Biomonitoring of exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons of nonoccupationally exposed persons, CANC EPID B, 9(4), 2000, pp. 373-380
In a field study with 69 subjects, we investigated the influence of smoking
, exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), diet, and location of resi
dence on biomarkers for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), including u
rinary excretion of 1-hydroxypyrene and benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) adducts of hem
oglobin and albumin. The self-reported smoking status and the extent of ETS
exposure mere verified by urinary cotinine measurements. ETS exposure was
quantified by nicotine and 3-ethenylpyridine measurements on personal sampl
ers worn by the nonsmokers over 5 or 7 days before blood and urine samples
were collected. Smokers (n = 27), on average, excreted 0.346 mu g/24 h 1-hy
droxypyrene, whereas the corresponding value for nonsmokers (n = 42) was 0.
157 mu g/24 h. Average BaP adduct levels with hemoglobin and albumin were 0
.105 fmol/mg and 0.042 fmol/mg, respectively, for smokers, and 0.068 fmol/m
g and 0.020 fmol/mg, respectively, for nonsmokers. The differences, except
for the hemoglobin adducts, were statistically significant. Of the 42 nonsm
okers, 19 were classified as passive smokers. There was no significant diff
erence in the PAH biomarkers between nonsmokers exposed to ETS and those no
t or rarely exposed to ETS.
Total dietary BaP intake, as calculated from questionnaire data, did not co
rrelate with any of the PAH biomarkers (r < 0.1). Subjects living in the su
burbs tended to have higher BaP-protein adduct levels than subjects living
in the city.
Our findings suggest that diet and smoking are major sources for PAH exposu
re of persons not occupationally exposed to PAH, whereas the influence of E
TS exposure is negligible. The lack of correlation between the dietary PAH
intake and the PAH biomarkers may be due to the inaccuracy of the estimate
for the dietary PAH intake.