Feldman et al. criticize the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventorie
s (CDIs) as having too much variability, too little stability, and insuffic
ient ability to predict early language delay. We present data showing that
these characteristics of the CDI are authentic reflections of individual di
fferences in early language development rather than measurement deficiencie
s. We also respond to their critical assertions concerning sociodemographic
influences on the CDI scores.