Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of combination tablets containing candesartan cilexetil and hydrochlorothiazide or losartan and hydrochlorothiazide in patients with moderate to severe hypertension - Results of the CARLOS-Study
W. Koenig, Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of combination tablets containing candesartan cilexetil and hydrochlorothiazide or losartan and hydrochlorothiazide in patients with moderate to severe hypertension - Results of the CARLOS-Study, CLIN DRUG I, 19(4), 2000, pp. 239-246
Objectives: To compare the fixed combinations of candesartan cilexetil and
hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) and losartan and HCTZ with respect to magnitude
and duration of antihypertensive effect and tolerability.
Design and Setting: This was a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group stu
dy conducted at nine centres in Germany.
Patients: 160 patients with moderate to severe hypertension, untreated or n
ot controlled on previous treatment, completed the study.
Interventions: Patients were randomised to 6 weeks of treatment with candes
artan cilexetil and HCTZ 16/12.5mg once daily (n = 81) or losartan and HCTZ
50/12.5mg once daily (n = 79). Blood pressure measurements were performed
approximately 24 and 48 hours after the last dose.
Results: Both candesartan cilexetil/HCTZ and losartan/HCTZ lowered blood pr
essure significantly compared with baseline. Mean seated blood pressures we
re reduced by 32.2/21.1mm Hg (systolic/diastolic) after 6 weeks, 24 hours p
ostdose, in the candesartan cilexetil/HCTZ group. Corresponding reductions
in the losartan/HCTZ group were 23.8/14.9mm Hg. The mean differences in ant
ihypertensive effect between treatments were 8.4/6.2mm Hg in favour of cand
esartan cilexetil (p < 0.001). Blood pressure reductions 48 hours postdose
were 25.6/16.4mm Hg for candesartan cilexetil/HCTZ End 9.2/4.2mm Hg for los
artan/HCTZ, with differences between treatments being highly significant in
favour of candesartan cilexetil/HCTZ (16.5/12.2mm Hg; p < 0.001). The prop
ortions of responders (seated diastolic blood pressure less than or equal t
o 90mm Hg and/or a reduction from baseline greater than or equal to 10mm Hg
) and controlled patients (seated diastolic blood pressure less than or equ
al to 90mm Hg) on candesartan cilexetil/HCTZ were 98 and 58% at 24 hours, a
nd 84 and 37% at 48 hours postdose. Corresponding figures for losartan/HCTZ
were 79 and 28%, and 18 and 1.3%, respectively. All differences were signi
ficant (p < 0.001) in favour of candesartan cilexetil/HCTZ. Both treatments
were well tolerated.
Conclusions: Candesartan oilexetil/HCTZ 16/12.5mg once daily reduced blood
pressure more effectively than losartan/HCTZ 50/12.5mg once daily both 24 a
nd 48 hours postdose. The long-lasting effect of candesartan cilcxetil/HCTZ
provides effective blood pressure control even Lifter a missed dose.