Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of combination tablets containing candesartan cilexetil and hydrochlorothiazide or losartan and hydrochlorothiazide in patients with moderate to severe hypertension - Results of the CARLOS-Study

Authors
Citation
W. Koenig, Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of combination tablets containing candesartan cilexetil and hydrochlorothiazide or losartan and hydrochlorothiazide in patients with moderate to severe hypertension - Results of the CARLOS-Study, CLIN DRUG I, 19(4), 2000, pp. 239-246
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology,"Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION
ISSN journal
11732563 → ACNP
Volume
19
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
239 - 246
Database
ISI
SICI code
1173-2563(200004)19:4<239:COTEAT>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the fixed combinations of candesartan cilexetil and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) and losartan and HCTZ with respect to magnitude and duration of antihypertensive effect and tolerability. Design and Setting: This was a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group stu dy conducted at nine centres in Germany. Patients: 160 patients with moderate to severe hypertension, untreated or n ot controlled on previous treatment, completed the study. Interventions: Patients were randomised to 6 weeks of treatment with candes artan cilexetil and HCTZ 16/12.5mg once daily (n = 81) or losartan and HCTZ 50/12.5mg once daily (n = 79). Blood pressure measurements were performed approximately 24 and 48 hours after the last dose. Results: Both candesartan cilexetil/HCTZ and losartan/HCTZ lowered blood pr essure significantly compared with baseline. Mean seated blood pressures we re reduced by 32.2/21.1mm Hg (systolic/diastolic) after 6 weeks, 24 hours p ostdose, in the candesartan cilexetil/HCTZ group. Corresponding reductions in the losartan/HCTZ group were 23.8/14.9mm Hg. The mean differences in ant ihypertensive effect between treatments were 8.4/6.2mm Hg in favour of cand esartan cilexetil (p < 0.001). Blood pressure reductions 48 hours postdose were 25.6/16.4mm Hg for candesartan cilexetil/HCTZ End 9.2/4.2mm Hg for los artan/HCTZ, with differences between treatments being highly significant in favour of candesartan cilexetil/HCTZ (16.5/12.2mm Hg; p < 0.001). The prop ortions of responders (seated diastolic blood pressure less than or equal t o 90mm Hg and/or a reduction from baseline greater than or equal to 10mm Hg ) and controlled patients (seated diastolic blood pressure less than or equ al to 90mm Hg) on candesartan cilexetil/HCTZ were 98 and 58% at 24 hours, a nd 84 and 37% at 48 hours postdose. Corresponding figures for losartan/HCTZ were 79 and 28%, and 18 and 1.3%, respectively. All differences were signi ficant (p < 0.001) in favour of candesartan cilexetil/HCTZ. Both treatments were well tolerated. Conclusions: Candesartan oilexetil/HCTZ 16/12.5mg once daily reduced blood pressure more effectively than losartan/HCTZ 50/12.5mg once daily both 24 a nd 48 hours postdose. The long-lasting effect of candesartan cilcxetil/HCTZ provides effective blood pressure control even Lifter a missed dose.