Objective: This study evaluated the quality of 40 generic clarithromycin pr
oducts from Latin America and Asia.
Materials and Methods: The generic products were examined visually, assayed
by high pressure liquid chromatography for clarithromycin content and impu
rities, tested for dissolution properties, and compared with the innovator
product manufactured by Abbott Laboratories.
Results: This survey found that many generic clarithromycin products are no
t equivalent to the innovator product, falling short of the approved, regis
tered specifications for the innovator product. Overall, 20% (8 of 40) of a
ll generic tablets tested, and 33% (6 of 18) of tablets from Latin America,
failed to contain between 95 and 105% of the clarithromycin claimed in the
label, thus falling short of the approved registered specification for the
innovator product. A total of 70% (28 of 40) of products tested released l
ess drug in 30 minutes than did the innovator tablets, although they still
met the dissolution specification requiring that 80% of the drug must disso
lve in 30 minutes; one generic product failed to meet the specification. A
total of 60% (24 of 40) of the generic products tested exceeded the Abbott
Laboratories' 3% limit for total impurities in bulk drug, and 70% (28 of 40
) exceeded the Abbott Laboratories' 0.8% limit for 6,11 di-O-methyl erythro
mycin A.
Conclusions: These results suggest that generic tablets are not equivalent
to the innovator product, raising concerns that clinical trial results achi
eved with branded clarithromycin (Abbott Laboratories) should not be extrap
olated to generic products.