Effectiveness of specific immunotherapy in the treatment of asthma: A meta-analysis of prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies
Rn. Ross et al., Effectiveness of specific immunotherapy in the treatment of asthma: A meta-analysis of prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies, CLIN THER, 22(3), 2000, pp. 329-341
Background: Despite decades of positive experience with specific immunother
apy (SIT) in the treatment of asthma, outcomes associated with SIT have not
been evaluated.
Objective: This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the effects of SIT p
lus medical treatment with those of SIT without medical treatment in patien
ts with asthma.
Methods: All studies of SIT in patients with asthma published in English be
tween the years 1966 and 1998 were identified through a MEDLINE(R) search.
All prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of SI
T identified by the search were included in the meta-analysis. One author (
R.N.R.) extracted data from these studies. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confid
ence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model.
Results: Data were extracted from 24 identified studies of the clinical eff
ectiveness of SIT in the treatment of asthma, involving 962 asthmatic patie
nts with documented allergy. Immunotherapy was judged effective in 17 (71%)
of the 24 studies, ineffective in 4 (17%), and equivocal in 3 (12%) (chi(2
) = 15.25, df = 2, P = 0.0005). Symptoms of asthma were more likely to impr
ove in patients who received SIT than in patients who received placebo (OR
2.76, 95% CI 2.22 to 3.42). Results also favored the immunotherapy group fo
r improvement in pulmonary function (OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.82 to 4.52), protect
ion against bronchial challenge (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.32 to 2.49), and reduced
need for medications (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.46 to 2.72).
Conclusion: The findings of this meta-analysis support the conclusion that
SIT is effective in a population of patients with allergen-triggered asthma
.