Rmh. Roumen et al., "Dog ear" formation after double-stapled low anterior resection as a risk factor for anastomotic disruption, DIS COL REC, 43(4), 2000, pp. 522-525
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the possible deleterious
effect of the lateral intersecting margins (so-called dog ears) on anastomo
tic disruption after experimentally performed double-stapled anastomoses. M
ETHODS: Two groups of double-stapled side-to-end anastomoses were performed
using pig small intestines. Group A consisted of 35 circular anastomoses a
nd Group B of 32 double-stapled anastomoses with a bilateral dog ear. In bo
th groups bursting pressures were tested using a water-filled, pressure-con
trolled automatic pumping system (Hamou Endomat(R)), and special attention
was paid to the location(s) in the anastomoses were the disruption(s) occur
red. RESULTS: In Group A bursting pressures were significantly higher than
in Group B (median pressure, 90 vs. GO mmHg, P < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U test
). Remarkably, in Group B in 13 cases (42 percent) the first disruption occ
urred at the corner of a dog ear. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the lateral
intersections of double-stapled anastomoses are a structural weak spot and
that the currently most often applied double-stapled anastomosis is a less
effective type of anastomosis than a complete circular one. Resolving this
technical problem might help to reduce the number of anastomotic disruptio
ns after low anterior resections.