Dose-response analysis provides a powerful tool to determine causality from
experimental cancer data, estimate low-dose risk, and evaluate mechanistic
hypotheses. However, the interpretation of cancer dose-response data can b
e influenced by how the dose and response terms are characterized. Using th
e poly-3 quantal response method to adjust for the extensive and early deve
lopment of lethal lymphomas in butadiene-exposed mice provided a means of o
btaining a better representation of dose-response relationships for late-de
veloping tumors induced by this chemical. Fitting a Weibull model to surviv
al-adjusted tamer data for chloroprene and butadiene indicated similar carc
inogenic potencies for these chemicals in mice. In conjunction with the rod
ent toxicity and carcinogenicity studies conducted by the National Toxicolo
gy Program, toxicokinetic studies are performed to characterize relationshi
ps between exposure and tissue concentrations of parent compound and metabo
lites. A. physiologically based pharmacokinetic model (PBPK) of butadiene d
osimetry indicated that differences in carcinogenic response between rats a
nd mice are not simply due to differences in tissue concentrations of epoxy
butene, a mutagenic metabolic intermediate. Thus, factors beyond tissue dos
imetry of this metabolite must be important in butadiene-induced carcinogen
esis. A PBPK model far isoprene indicated that brood concentrations of isop
rene epoxides are a better indicator of kidney cancer risk than are measure
ments of isoprene-exposure concentrations. An evaluation of dose response r
elationships for cytotoxicity, regenerative hyperplasia, and tumor inductio
n by trihalomethanes indicates that for this family of chemicals, cell prol
iferation is not a reliable predictor of tumor response.