M. Thiry, Palaeoclimatic interpretation of clay minerals in marine deposits: an outlook from the continental origin, EARTH SCI R, 49(1-4), 2000, pp. 201-221
As distribution of clay minerals in modern oceans seems to be controlled by
contemporary climates, marine clays in ancient deposits have been widely u
sed to reconstruct palaeoclimates. In this review, we examine this question
mainly from the continental origin of the clay minerals and show the diffi
culties of retrospective analysis of the influence of climate on common mar
ine deposits. We examine successively how soils develop and behave, are rew
orked and palaeoweatherings are preserved, focusing the review on kaoliniti
c soils indicative of tropical wet climates. Several stages intervene betwe
en the time of clay mineral development in soils and their final deposition
in the basin: (1) The persistence over geological times of huge amounts of
kaolinitic palaeoweathering materials in the landscapes may seriously alte
r the palaeoclimatic signal of kaolinite in the sedimentary record. Althoug
h the kaolinite deposited in recent sediments of the world oceans is consis
tent with wet climatic zones, this is mainly because the major kaolinitic a
nd bauxitic palaeosurfaces coincide with the tropical areas where kaolinite
is still developing at present. (2) Possible development of deep kaoliniti
c profiles at high latitudes and cold conditions, under CO2-enriched palaeo
atmospheres, or even by unusual acidic weathering linked with dry climates
is misleading palaeoenvironments for palaeoclimatic reconstruction. (3) Ero
sion and transport processes always cloud the signal to some extent, becaus
e frequently, erosion products from the bedrock and different soil horizons
will be mixed and major drainage systems may include soils of different cl
imatic zones. (4) The arrival of the soil clay assemblages in the basin ine
vitably lags against their formation on the continent and may occur several
million years after formation of the soils on the continent and climate ma
y have considerably changed at that time. It is pointed out that sedimentol
ogists and palaeoclimatologists should consider the complexity of the relat
ions between soil and sedimentary clay minerals. Soil formation rates are s
low and therefore the resolution of the palaeoclimatic record in marine cla
y may not be closer than 1 or 2 Ma. At present, the palaeoclimatic interpre
tations of marine clay assemblages are yielding, at best, nothing more than
rather broad palaeoclimatic information. This approach cannot achieve the
same degree of resolution as other techniques such as isotope or microfossi
l studies. Clay mineral assemblages may provide integrated records of overa
ll climatic impacts, whereas other techniques are more likely to reveal loc
al or temporary climates. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserve
d.