Chlorpyrifos is a moderately toxic organophosphate pesticide. Houses and la
wns in the United States receive a total of approximately 20 million annual
chlorpyrifos treatments, and 82% of U.S. adults have detectable levels of
a chlorpyrifos metabolite (3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol; TCP) in the urine.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has estimated that there are 5,000
yearly reported cases of accidental chlorpyrifos poisoning, and approximat
ely one-fourth of these cases exhibit symptoms. Organophosphates affect the
nervous system, but there are few epidemiologic data on chlorpyrifos neuro
toxicity. We studied neurologic function in 191 current and former termitic
ide applicators who had an average of 2.4 years applying chlorpyrifos and 2
.5 years applying other pesticides, and we compared them to 189 nonexposed
controls. The average urinary TCP level for 65 recently exposed applicators
was 629.5 mu g/L, as compared to 4.5 mu g/L for the general U.S. populatio
n. The exposed group did not differ significantly from the nonexposed group
for any test in the clinical examination. Few significant differences were
found in nerve conduction velocity, arm/hand tremor, vibrotactile sensitiv
ity, vision, smell, visual/motor skills, or neurobehavioral skills. The exp
osed group did not perform as well as the nonexposed group in pegboard turn
ing tests and some postural sway tests. The exposed subjects also reported
significantly more symptoms, including memory problems, emotional scares, f
atigue, and loss of muscle strength; our more quantitative tests may not ha
ve been adequate to detect these symptoms. Eight men who reported past chlo
rpyrifos poisoning had a pattern of low performance on a number of tests, w
hich is consistent with prior reports of chronic effects of organophosphate
poisoning. Overall, the lack of exposure effects on the clinical examinati
on was reassuring. The findings for self-reported symptoms raise some conce
rn, as does the Ending of low performance For those reporting prior poisoni
ng. Although this was a relatively large study based on a well-defined targ
et population, the workers we studied may not be representative of all expo
sed workers, and caution should be exercised in generalizing our results.