Cleaning up pesticide contaminated soils: Comparing effectiveness of supercritical fluid extraction with solvent extraction and low temperature thermal desorption
E. Sahle-demessie et T. Richardson, Cleaning up pesticide contaminated soils: Comparing effectiveness of supercritical fluid extraction with solvent extraction and low temperature thermal desorption, ENV TECHNOL, 21(4), 2000, pp. 447-456
Bench-scale supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) studies were performed on
soil samples obtained from a Superfund site that is contaminated with high
levels of p,p'-DDT, p,p'-DDD, p,p'-DDE, toxaphene and hexachlorocyclohexane
. The effectiveness of supercritical fluid extraction was assessed using pu
re and modified CO2 as a solvent over a wide range of conditions. A 30-minu
te extraction at 30 MPa and 80 degrees C was able to remove more than 98% o
f the contaminants and reduce the contaminated volume by a factor of 500. S
olvent extraction and thermal desorption treatability studies were conducte
d on soil samples obtained from the same site to compare their performance
with that of supercritical fluid extraction. A six-stage solvent extraction
using methanol achieved 96 to 98% removal of the four contaminants, except
for DDE which existed at low initial concentrations. The contaminated volu
me reduction was 40 to 50 times. Low temperature thermal desorption employe
d at 350 degrees C for 30 minutes removed more than 98% for each contaminan
t except DDE. However, solvent extraction includes costly solvent regenerat
ion and recycling steps, and thermal desorption generates air pollutants th
at require expensive particulate removal and gas stream cleaning. This stud
y attempted to show that SFE can be as effective as other emerging technolo
gies in removing contaminants from soils, and can reduce the contaminated v
olume by a large factor.