Seaweeds have long been known to support abundant populations of bacteria s
o it is surprising that few studies have considered the abundance of hetero
trophic protists on seaweed surfaces. A year-long study was conducted to in
vestigate the numbers of heterotrophic protists on undamaged and damaged ti
ssue of a number of intertidal species of seaweed. Generally, amoebae and f
lagellates numbered less than 20 cells cm(-2) on undamaged seaweed tissue b
ut were found in greater numbers (more than 20 cm(-2)) on damaged tissue. C
iliates were around 1 or 2 cells cm(-2) on undamaged seaweeds and between 1
and 5 cm(-2) On damaged tissue. Numbers of heterotrophic dinoflagellates a
nd heterotrophic diatoms were similar to those of ciliates in late summer a
nd autumn when seaweeds were producing increased amounts of dissolved organ
ic carbon. By assuming that ' true ' surface protists inhabited the thin su
rface film of water on seaweeds, comparisons were drawn with the numbers of
protists in nearby open waters. After using appropriate conversion factors
, both amoebae and flagellates were more abundant in the surface film (per
mi) than in the open water. In particular, surface amoebae averaged around
1800 cells ml(-1) but only reached around 19 cells ml(-1) in open water. Th
e results are discussed in relation to the various sources of nutrition ava
ilable to heterotrophic protists on macroalgae. The high numbers of amoebae
suggest that they are the major micropredators of bacteria on seaweed surf
aces. (C) 2000 Academic Press.