The abundance of heterotrophic protists associated with intertidal seaweeds

Citation
E. Armstrong et al., The abundance of heterotrophic protists associated with intertidal seaweeds, EST COAST S, 50(3), 2000, pp. 415-424
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Aquatic Sciences
Journal title
ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE
ISSN journal
02727714 → ACNP
Volume
50
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
415 - 424
Database
ISI
SICI code
0272-7714(200003)50:3<415:TAOHPA>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Seaweeds have long been known to support abundant populations of bacteria s o it is surprising that few studies have considered the abundance of hetero trophic protists on seaweed surfaces. A year-long study was conducted to in vestigate the numbers of heterotrophic protists on undamaged and damaged ti ssue of a number of intertidal species of seaweed. Generally, amoebae and f lagellates numbered less than 20 cells cm(-2) on undamaged seaweed tissue b ut were found in greater numbers (more than 20 cm(-2)) on damaged tissue. C iliates were around 1 or 2 cells cm(-2) on undamaged seaweeds and between 1 and 5 cm(-2) On damaged tissue. Numbers of heterotrophic dinoflagellates a nd heterotrophic diatoms were similar to those of ciliates in late summer a nd autumn when seaweeds were producing increased amounts of dissolved organ ic carbon. By assuming that ' true ' surface protists inhabited the thin su rface film of water on seaweeds, comparisons were drawn with the numbers of protists in nearby open waters. After using appropriate conversion factors , both amoebae and flagellates were more abundant in the surface film (per mi) than in the open water. In particular, surface amoebae averaged around 1800 cells ml(-1) but only reached around 19 cells ml(-1) in open water. Th e results are discussed in relation to the various sources of nutrition ava ilable to heterotrophic protists on macroalgae. The high numbers of amoebae suggest that they are the major micropredators of bacteria on seaweed surf aces. (C) 2000 Academic Press.