Influence of the maze procedure on the treatment of rheumatic atrial fibrillation - evaluation of rhythm control and clinical outcome in a comparative study
Mb. Jatene et al., Influence of the maze procedure on the treatment of rheumatic atrial fibrillation - evaluation of rhythm control and clinical outcome in a comparative study, EUR J CAR-T, 17(2), 2000, pp. 117-123
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the maze
procedure on the treatment of rheumatic atrial fibrillation in patients wit
h mitral valve disease. Methods: Fifty-five patients (mean age 51 years; 47
females) with rheumatic mitral valve disease and associated atrial fibrill
ation in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV, preoperativ
ely, were operated upon. Thirty-five had double dysfunction, 19 had stenosi
s, and one had mitral regurgitation. None had other associated heart diseas
es or previous operations. The patients were divided into two groups: GI, 2
0 patients were treated for mitral valve disease with associated maze proce
dure; GII, 35 patients were treated for mitral valve disease without the ma
ze procedure. The preoperative echocardiogram showed a left atrial diameter
in GI of 5.35 mm and in GII of 5.57 mm (P = 0.779). The groups were consid
ered clinically similar (P = 0.759). Cardiopulmonary bypass was used in all
patients. The mitral valve was replaced with a biological prosthesis in 24
patients and repaired in 31 patients. Results: Three hospital deaths occur
red, one in GI, two in GLI. After cardiopulmonary bypass, 37.1% of patients
in GII remained in atrial fibrillation. All patients in GI recovered regul
ar rhythm (P < 0.0001). In the ICU, atrial fibrillation was detected in 80%
of patients in GII and maintained in 76.4% in a mean follow-up period of 3
8.5 months. In GI, atrial fibrillation occurred in 20% of patients in the I
CU and maintained in 5.3% in 41 months of mean follow-up (P = 0.0001). None
of the patients in GI and 20.6% of patients in GLI had a thromboembolic ep
isode 1-63 months after the operation (P = 0.041). Four late deaths occurre
d (two in each group), two being due to progression of valvular disease, on
e after an episode of pulmonary infection and one with no cardiac cause. Co
nclusion: The maze procedure is effective in treating atrial fibrillation i
n patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease. The results are sustained i
n the mid-term follow-up period, preventing postoperative thromboembolic ep
isodes, and with acceptable morbidity and mortality. Published by Elsevier
Science B.V.