Influence of the maze procedure on the treatment of rheumatic atrial fibrillation - evaluation of rhythm control and clinical outcome in a comparative study

Citation
Mb. Jatene et al., Influence of the maze procedure on the treatment of rheumatic atrial fibrillation - evaluation of rhythm control and clinical outcome in a comparative study, EUR J CAR-T, 17(2), 2000, pp. 117-123
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY
ISSN journal
10107940 → ACNP
Volume
17
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
117 - 123
Database
ISI
SICI code
1010-7940(200002)17:2<117:IOTMPO>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the maze procedure on the treatment of rheumatic atrial fibrillation in patients wit h mitral valve disease. Methods: Fifty-five patients (mean age 51 years; 47 females) with rheumatic mitral valve disease and associated atrial fibrill ation in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV, preoperativ ely, were operated upon. Thirty-five had double dysfunction, 19 had stenosi s, and one had mitral regurgitation. None had other associated heart diseas es or previous operations. The patients were divided into two groups: GI, 2 0 patients were treated for mitral valve disease with associated maze proce dure; GII, 35 patients were treated for mitral valve disease without the ma ze procedure. The preoperative echocardiogram showed a left atrial diameter in GI of 5.35 mm and in GII of 5.57 mm (P = 0.779). The groups were consid ered clinically similar (P = 0.759). Cardiopulmonary bypass was used in all patients. The mitral valve was replaced with a biological prosthesis in 24 patients and repaired in 31 patients. Results: Three hospital deaths occur red, one in GI, two in GLI. After cardiopulmonary bypass, 37.1% of patients in GII remained in atrial fibrillation. All patients in GI recovered regul ar rhythm (P < 0.0001). In the ICU, atrial fibrillation was detected in 80% of patients in GII and maintained in 76.4% in a mean follow-up period of 3 8.5 months. In GI, atrial fibrillation occurred in 20% of patients in the I CU and maintained in 5.3% in 41 months of mean follow-up (P = 0.0001). None of the patients in GI and 20.6% of patients in GLI had a thromboembolic ep isode 1-63 months after the operation (P = 0.041). Four late deaths occurre d (two in each group), two being due to progression of valvular disease, on e after an episode of pulmonary infection and one with no cardiac cause. Co nclusion: The maze procedure is effective in treating atrial fibrillation i n patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease. The results are sustained i n the mid-term follow-up period, preventing postoperative thromboembolic ep isodes, and with acceptable morbidity and mortality. Published by Elsevier Science B.V.