B. Jansen et al., Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the novel H-1-receptor antagonistemedastine in healthy volunteers, EUR J CL PH, 55(11-12), 2000, pp. 837-841
Objective: Emedastine is a novel H-1-receptor antagonist with pre-clinicall
y well-documented antiallergic effects. Here, we set out to study the relat
ionship between emedastine pharmacokinetics and the suppressive effect on h
istamine-induced wheals and flares, and to compare these effects to placebo
and cetirizine.
Methods: Emedastine (4 mg q.d.), emedastine (2 mg b.i.d.), cetirizine (10 m
g q.d.) and placebo were administered to healthy volunteers in a double-bli
nd, cross-over fashion. On day 1 and day 5 (steady state) following drug ad
ministration, wheals and flares were induced by skin-prick testing with 1 m
g ml(-1) or 10 mg ml(-1) histamine.
Results: Following the administration of 4 mg emedastine q.d., mean area un
der the concentration-time curve (AUC)(0-24) values of 34.49 +/- 24.07 ng h
ml(-1) and 47.05 +/- 36.12 ng h ml(-1) were attained on day 1 and day 5, r
espectively. Following the administration of emedastine (2 mg b.i.d.) mean
AUC(0-24) values were 29.75 +/- 19.92 ng h ml(-1) and 46.13 +/- 38.50 ng h
ml(-1) on day 1 and day 5, respectively. Histamine-induced wheals and hares
were significantly more effectively suppressed by emedastine and cetirizin
e than placebo. At pharmacokinetic steady-state levels, no significant diff
erence could be found in the potency between cetirizine and emedastine (2 m
g b.i.d.).
Conclusion. Emedastine displays pharmacodynamic properties comparable with
cetirizine and therefore qualifies as a safe and alternative compound with
H-1-receptor antagonist properties. Additional larger studies may be needed
to substantiate potential benefits of cetirizine over emedastine after sin
gle-dose administration.