1 This paper offers a commentary on the development of island ecological th
eory since the publication of MacArthur & Wilson's equilibrium theory in th
e 1960s. I distinguish the simple model at the core of their Equilibrium Th
eory of Island Biogeography (ETIB) and the broader body of their theory, wh
ich embraces evolutionary as well as ecological patterns - all, however, wi
thin the overarching framework or assumption of equilibrium.
2 The basic problems with the ETIB have long been known, and its status as
a ruling paradigm has been the subject of concern for more than two decades
. With the development of nonequilibrium ideas in ecology, island biogeogra
phers arguably now have viable theoretical frameworks to set alongside or a
round the ETIB. Four conditions are highlighted as extremes: i) dynamic equ
ilibrium; ii) dynamic nonequilibrium; iii) 'static' equilibrium; and iv) 's
tatic' nonequilibrium: together providing a conceptual framework for island
ecological analyses.
3 The importance of scale is stressed and attention is drawn to Haila's spa
tial-temporal continuum as an organizational device. It is argued that the
processes represented within the ETIB (and by extension, other island theor
ies) may be prominent within only a limited portion of this continuum, whil
e elsewhere they are generally subsumed by other dominant processes.
4 Colonization and ecosystem development of near-shore islands constitute j
ust a special case of ecological succession, and thus the development of th
eories of island assembly may benefit accordingly from efforts to incorpora
te ideas from the ecological succession literature.
5 The desirability of specifying answerable questions is stressed, as is th
e need to build a greater degree of complexity into the development of isla
nd ecological models. Notwithstanding which, it is also recognized that key
advances are often brought about by simple, but bold models, of the form e
xemplified elsewhere in this issue.