Tj. Parker et al., A COMPARATIVE POPULATION PHARMACOKINETIC ANALYSIS FOR METHYLPREDNISOLONE FOLLOWING MULTIPLE DOSING OF 2 PRODRUGS IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE ASTHMA, British journal of clinical pharmacology, 43(6), 1997, pp. 589-592
Aims TO conduct a randomized, parallel group comparison of the populat
ion pharmacokinetics of the two methylprednisolone (MP) prodrugs Prome
drol (MP suleptanate) and Solu-Medrol (MP succinate) in patients hospi
talized with acute asthma. Methods Ninety volunteers were included in
the pharmacokinetic analysis. Each volunteer received a dosage regimen
of 40 mg (MP equivalents) i.v. 6 hourly for 48 h. The bio-conversion
and disposition of a 40 mg (MP equivalent) i.v. dose of either MP sule
ptanate or MP succinate to MP was modelled as a fist order input, and
a mono-exponential elimination phase. Results Population modelling ind
icated that the only difference in MP pharmacokinetics between MP sule
ptanate and MP succinate was in the input rate constant (66.0 h(-1) vs
5.5 h(-1) respectively). Based on individual Bayesian estimates, the
exposure of patients to MP was marginally lower for MP suleptanate alt
hough the parameter estimates were not significantly different for hal
f-life (2.7 h vs 3.0 h), steady-state AUC (2007.0 ng ml(-1) h vs 2321.
0 ng ml(-1) h) and steady-state C-max (698.4 ng ml(-1) vs 647.8 ng ml(
-1)) for MP suleptanate and MP succinate respectively. Conclusions It
was concluded that for the multiple dosage regimen used in patients wi
th acute asthma the systemic exposure to MP following dosing with MP s
uleptanate is similar to that arising from MP succinate. In addition t
he differences in the pharmacokinetics for the prodrugs resulted in on
ly a small difference in the relative bioavailability of MP for MP sul
eptanate (0.94) compared with MP succinate.