Evaluation of the interobserver agreement in the number of mitotic figuresof breast carcinoma as simulation of quality monitoring in the Japan National Surgical Adjuvant Study of Breast Cancer (NSAS-BC) protocol
H. Tsuda et al., Evaluation of the interobserver agreement in the number of mitotic figuresof breast carcinoma as simulation of quality monitoring in the Japan National Surgical Adjuvant Study of Breast Cancer (NSAS-BC) protocol, JPN J CANC, 91(4), 2000, pp. 451-457
In the National Surgical Adjuvant Study for Breast Cancer (NSAS-BC), node-n
egative breast cancers were divided into higher- and lower-risk groups acco
rding to the histopathological nuclear grade given at individual collaborat
ing hospitals, and the higher-risk group was entered into a randomized prot
ocol of adjuvant therapy. Because the nuclear grade was the composite of nu
clear atypia and mitotic counts, maintenance of interobserver agreement in
mitotic counts was indispensable for the success of the protocol study. Fou
rteen pathologists participating in the protocol judged whether or not 20 p
hotomicrographs suspected of showing mitotic cancer-cell figures truly show
ed mitoses, After standardizing the counting method, these pathologists cou
nted the number of mitotic figures per 10 high-power fields of hematoxylin-
eosin-stained main-tissue sections of 20 tumors. Areas where mitotic counts
were considered to be the most frequent by each pathologist were compared
for these tumors, For the judgment of whether the photomicrograph indicated
mitosis, the level of interobserver agreement was moderate (kappa=0.569).
In the observations of 20 tumors, interobserver agreement level of mitotic
counts was moderate (kappa=0.506), that of nuclear atypia scoring was fair
(kappa=0.265), and that of nuclear grading was substantial (kappa=0.633), T
he counted area was almost the same among the observers in 9 tumors, split
into two areas in 6, and dispersed in 5. Concordance in judgment was achiev
ed in 7 of the first 9 and in all of the third 5, but only in one of the se
cond 6. The cause of discordance was mostly derived from tumor heterogeneit
y and the difference in the site where mitoses were counted, Interobserver
agreement level was considered to be satisfactory, and it was expected that
the case entry would be performed appropriately in the protocol study, The
selection of the counting area was confirmed to be important for the acqui
sition of high-level agreement level in mitotic counts.