Chronic urticaria remains a major problem in terms of etiology, investigati
on, and management. It is important to identify patients in whom physical u
rticaria is the principal cause of disability. Once confirmed by appropriat
e challenge testing, no further investigation is required. Urticarial vascu
litis (UV) is a major differential diagnosis of "idiopathic" urticaria (CIU
). I perform biopsy of most patients in this category because UV cannot be
considered confirmed in the absence of histologic evidence. Patients with c
onfirmed UV need to be thoroughly investigated for paraproteins, lupus eryt
hematosus hepatitis B and C, and inflammatory bowel disease. Of patients wi
th CIU, a few (<5%) prove to have food additive reactivity confirmed by pla
cebo-controlled challenge testing. There is no convincing evidence of the i
nvolvement of Helicobacter pylori or parasite infestation as a cause of chr
onic urticaria, although H pylori could have an indirect role. Recently it
has become clear that 27% to 50% of patients with CIU hare functional autoa
ntibodies directed against the alpha-chain of the high-affinity IgE recepto
r or less commonly against IgG. These antibodies, whose involvement has now
been independently confirmed in several centers, are identified by autolog
ous serum shin testing and confirmed by histamine release studies or immuno
blotting. Their removal (by intravenous Ig or plasmapheresis) or treatment
by cyclosporine has proved highly beneficial in severely affected patients.
However, the routine treatment of all CIU patients, irrespective of etiolo
gy, remains the Judicious use of H-1 antihistamines.