Water vapor, CO2, and temperature profiles in and above a forest - Accuracy assessment of an unattended measurement system

Citation
M. Molder et al., Water vapor, CO2, and temperature profiles in and above a forest - Accuracy assessment of an unattended measurement system, J ATMOSP OC, 17(4), 2000, pp. 417-425
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY
ISSN journal
07390572 → ACNP
Volume
17
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
417 - 425
Database
ISI
SICI code
0739-0572(200004)17:4<417:WVCATP>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
The possibility of a global climate change has increased research interest in the least understood parts of the climate system. One of those parts is the boundary between the land surface of the earth and the lowest part of t he planetary boundary layer. The structure of this layer and the exchange p rocesses in it are still incompletely understood for a variety of situation s and surfaces, especially in the boreal zone and during the dark parts of the day and the year. Progress in this area requires new data measured cont inuously and unattended with high accuracy and long-term reliability. A mea surement system for profiles of temperature, humidity, and carbon dioxide w as designed to meet the above goals. The system used thermocouples and a Li -Cor gas analyzer combined with an array of tubing to suck air from differe nt heights. Turbulent fluctuations of water vapor and carbon dioxide concen trations were smoothed by continuous-flow mixing chambers without moving pa rts. Half-hourly mean differences in temperature, humidity, and CO2 were me asured to better than 0.03 K, 0.015 g kg(-1) and 0.5 mu mol mol(-1), respec tively. These accuracies were confirmed by comparisons with a thermometer-i nterchange (reversing) system and CO2 profiles theoretically deduced from e ddy-correlation fluxes. Daytime temperature and humidity differences over t he full height interval (24.5-87.5 m), as well as over the roughness sublay er part (24.5-58.5 m), commonly exceeded the estimated errors by five times . The CO2 differences could only be measured reasonably accurately over the entire height interval (24.5-87.5 m) and then only exceeded the error by a factor of 2-3. Temperature and humidity measurements were sufficiently acc urate for studies of flux-profile relationships over a forest. The CO2 prof iles were accurate only for rough flux estimates and may be especially usef ul for nighttime studies.